[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise



On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:44:07AM +0900, Fedor Zuev wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:

> >At a cost. While I understand the desire for the invariant
> >sections, it can be wondered what freedom is most desirable: the
> >freedom to run, study, redistribute and improve for everyone, or
> >the freedom to run, study, redistribute and improve for only those
> >that agree with your philosophy, and will not remove it from any
> >accompanying documentation.

> >If people disagree with what you say, you should not prohibit them
> >from doing so. You're still a well-known person who can reasonably
> >assume that what you write or say will not go unnoticed. Even if
> >it's removed from one distribution of a manual.

> 	I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone
> opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's opinion, so
> angrily demanded by you.

Censoring somebody else's opinion by doing something like killfilling
them?

<plonk>

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpSNPFgXtTRL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: