Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?

To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
From: rkrishnan@symonds.net (Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan)
Date: 22 Aug 2003 07:20:57 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] 86k7968npa.fsf@symonds.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030821150720.GB16122@wile.excelhustler.com>
References: <[🔎] 20030821050954.GA6481@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20030821150720.GB16122@wile.excelhustler.com>

 || On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:07:20 -0500
 || John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> wrote: 

 jg> Before I reply, I should add I still see it as wrong and misleading to apply
 jg> *software* guidelines to *documentation*, which to me are fundamentally
 jg> different beasts.  Thus, I see the question as rather misleading.

Precisely. I too believe that software and documentation should be treated seperately
and hence went for the last option.

-- 
   Ramakrishnan                   <rkrishnan@debian.org>
   Use Free Software -- Help stamp out Software Hoarding!

Reply to:

References:
- SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>

Prev by Date: MBSOPPRAPP02 found FILE FILTER= *.pif file
Next by Date: Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Previous by thread: Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Next by thread: Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread