Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey Spiridonov <email@example.com> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >>I still wonder why people with the same ardour and consistency do not speak
> >>about distribution of software in the non-free section? Why Debian
> >>distributes non-free?
> > Don't knock it! We might need it soon to hold all the GFDL manuals.
> It's interesting that people who want Debian to move FDL to non-free at the
> same time want Debian to distribute non-free stuff.
> Is it accidental?
Well you want to distribute non-free stuff in main, which to me is far
worse. At least I don't want to mis-represent non-free stuff as free.
I want it plainly labelled as non-free.
(And I won't care that much if we kill non-free anyway, even with
FSF manuals in it. We'll get them someplace else.)