Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:00:04 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] bhhst2$32n$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnbjoblf.31q.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
References: <[🔎] bhfba6$1ha$2@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] A14FC4A4-CE8E-11D7-ADFA-00039317863E@suespammers.org> <[🔎] A14FC4A4-CE8E-11D7-ADFA-00039317863E@suespammers.org> <[🔎] bhgq4r$m71$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] slrnbjoblf.31q.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>

MJ Ray wrote:

Sergey V. Spiridonov <sena@hurd.homeunix.org> wrote:
It is quite clear that it is not the intended way to enforce FDL. Sinceit is not fixed till now, I conclude there is no bug here.
Cool!  Until there is a fix, a bug isn't a bug?  Someone tell the RM.


Note, I meant bug in wording, not in intention.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by Date: Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread