debian-legal Feb 2006 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Adam McKenna

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 15
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 23
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 15
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 15
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14

Alexander Schmehl

Re: are PHP license 3.0 or 3.1 compatible with Debian ? Feb 02

Alexander Terekhov

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Feb 04
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Feb 15
Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Feb 05
Re: gnome-vfs daemon, GPL and LGPL Feb 24
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Feb 25
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 16
Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Feb 25
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Feb 15
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Feb 14
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 14
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 18
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 16
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Feb 25
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 14
Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Feb 13
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 18
EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 14
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 16
Re: libgsm: right to distribute Feb 06
Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Feb 06
Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions Feb 14
Re: Moglen's "all good faith" Feb 09
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 14
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Feb 15
Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions Feb 09
Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Feb 24
Re: libgsm: right to distribute Feb 04
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 20
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 11
Re: legal residence for corporations Feb 12

Andrew Donnellan

Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Feb 03
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 11
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 22
Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Feb 03
Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Feb 08
Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions Feb 17
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04

Anthony DeRobertis

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 17
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Feb 14
Re: Adobe open source license -- is this licence free? Feb 11
Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions Feb 14
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 22
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 17
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 17
A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13

Anthony Towns

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 09

Anton Zinoviev

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14

Benj. Mako Hill

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 12
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 11
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Feb 13
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
GPLv3 Drafting Process Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 12
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 15
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 11

Bernhard R. Link

Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 05

Bill Allombert

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07

Bjorn Roche

Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 20

Brian M. Carlson

Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 21
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 21
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 07

bug1

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Feb 05
Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Feb 04

Charles Fry

please update the license text Feb 09
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 11
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 02
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 03
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 11

Craig Sanders

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13

C Shore

Re: copyright law vs. license text (Was: Honesty in Debian) Feb 14

Daniel Ruoso

copyright law vs. license text (Was: Honesty in Debian) Feb 13

David M . Besonen

Don Armstrong

Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Feb 25
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Feb 09
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 10
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 03
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Feb 08
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 03
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 06
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 06
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 20

Eduard Bloch

Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Feb 25
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Feb 25
changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Feb 24
Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Feb 24

Eric Dantan Rzewnicki

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19

Felix Kühling

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 10
FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 09

Florian Weimer

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: Anti-DMCA clause (was Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 11
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 09
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Trademark policy for packages? Feb 02

Francesco Poli

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 17
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 11
Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 02
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 11
Re: are PHP license 3.0 or 3.1 compatible with Debian ? Feb 02
Re: example of unacceptable invariant section (was Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 08
Re: A tool for checking licenses Feb 17
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 12
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 15
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: please update the license text Feb 11

Gervase Markham

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 10

Gledd Maynard

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 18

Glenn Maynard

Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 20
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 21
Re: Trademark policy for packages? Feb 02
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 16
Re: Adobe open source license -- is this licence free? Feb 11
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 11
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 15
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 03
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 11
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 09
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 09
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 15
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 09
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 11
Re: libgsm: right to distribute Feb 04
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 11
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 12
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 21
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: KDE application relicensing Feb 07
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: KDE application relicensing Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 09
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 09
Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Feb 03
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Trademark policy for packages? Feb 02
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 15
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 10
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 12
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 16
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 17

Hamish Moffatt

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13

Henning Makholm

Re: ICCLEIYSIUYA -license Feb 08
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 17
Re: Trademark policy for packages? Feb 02

Hubert Chan

Re: Anton's amendment Feb 06
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Feb 13
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: Anton's amendment Feb 06
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Feb 14

Frank Küster

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 21
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Feb 15
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 20
Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Feb 17
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 20

José Carlos do Nascimento Medeiros

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 02
are PHP license 3.0 or 3.1 compatible with Debian ? Feb 02
MIT License are DFSG complicant ? Feb 06

Måns Rullgård

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 28

Jari Aalto

[DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 09
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 09

JC Helary

Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 09

Jeremy Hankins

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 15
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 13
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 12
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 13
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08

Jim Westveer

Re: Regarding partner Feb 16

Joerg Jaspert

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 10
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 11

Joe Smith

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14

John Goerzen

Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 14
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 14

Josh Triplett

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 21
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 12
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Feb 12
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08

Josselin Mouette

gnome-vfs daemon, GPL and LGPL Feb 23

Juhapekka Tolvanen

ICCLEIYSIUYA -license Feb 07

Junichi Uekawa

portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19
Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19
Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 22

Justin Pryzby

Re: MIT License are DFSG complicant ? Feb 06

Kai Hendry

Affero General Public License Feb 07

Kalle Kivimaa

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 15

Kel Modderman

upstream license patched in debian package Feb 24
Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Feb 24
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Feb 25

Lasse Reichstein Nielsen

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 13

Lionel Elie Mamane

Re: gnome-vfs daemon, GPL and LGPL Feb 24
Re: License of oui.txt file? Feb 10

Luca Brivio

Re: MIT License are DFSG complicant ? Feb 07

Mahesh T. Pai

Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 09
Re: legal residence for corporations Feb 12
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 09
Re: copyright law vs. license text Feb 14

Manoj Srivastava

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13

Marco d'Itri

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Feb 25
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 09
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 09
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 03
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Feb 17
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07

Mark Rafn

Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Feb 17
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Can Affero-like limitations be free? Feb 07
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: GPLv3 affero-compatibility (Re: Affero General Public License) Feb 09
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 03
GPLv3 affero-compatibility (Re: Affero General Public License) Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07

Markus Meyer

Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19

Martin Schulze

Re: Dispossessing the FSF Feb 13

Matt Brubeck

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 20

Matthew Palmer

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 09
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 10

Matthew Woodcraft

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08

Michael Poole

Re: libgsm: right to distribute Feb 04
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 18
Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Feb 24
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22

MJ Ray

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 10
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 12
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Feb 13
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 06
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 22
GPLv3 Drafting Process Feb 09
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03

Moritz Muehlenhoff

Re: libgsm: right to distribute Feb 04

Nathanael Nerode

Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Feb 06
legal residence for corporations Feb 11
Re: Anti-DMCA clause (was Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 01
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: Trademark policy for packages? Feb 02
Re: Anti-DMCA clause (was Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 28
example of unacceptable invariant section (was Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 08
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 28
Re: Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 14
Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Feb 06

nororika

��m�点�ł� Feb 24

olive

Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 16
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 04
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 16
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 23
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 06
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 16
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 07
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 23
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 01
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 18
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 19
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 08
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 06
Re: example of unacceptable invariant section (was Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 08
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 21
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Feb 15
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 21
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Feb 15
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Feb 15
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14

Patrick Herzig

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 10
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 16
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 10
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 21

Pavel Šimerda

Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 01

Peter Samuelson

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13

Raul Miller

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 21
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 21
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 20
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 17
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14

Regis Boudin

KDE application relicensing Feb 07
Re: KDE application relicensing Feb 07

Rich Walker

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 09
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 09

Robert McGwier

Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19

Ross Bencina

Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 20
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 20

Sanjoy Mahajan

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14

Sebastian Wieseler

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 11
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 11

Simon Huerlimann

Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 20
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Feb 20

Simon Josefsson

Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Feb 17
Re: Trademark policy for packages? Feb 01
Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Feb 17
Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Feb 17
Re: Trademark policy for packages? Feb 01

Simon Neininger

libgsm: right to distribute Feb 04

Steffen Hoffmann

question about Debian-Logo Feb 05

Stephen Gran

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 19
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 22

Steve Langasek

Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: Regarding partner Feb 17
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 06
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: GPL v3 Draft Feb 14
Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Feb 17
Re: gpl and hosted apps Feb 04
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 07
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 15
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 03
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 09
Re: GPLv3 affero-compatibility (Re: Affero General Public License) Feb 09
Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Feb 17
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Feb 10
Re: Affero General Public License Feb 09
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 11
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 04
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Feb 16

Stuart Yeates

Re: copyright law vs. license text (Was: Honesty in Debian) Feb 13

Sune Vuorela

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Feb 09

Sven Luther

Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Feb 14

Thomas Bushnell BSG

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 13

tim hall

Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 20
Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 27
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Feb 20

Uwe Hermann

Re: License of oui.txt file? Feb 09
License of oui.txt file? Feb 08

Ville Oksanen

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
A tool for checking licenses Feb 15

Walter Landry

Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: libgsm: right to distribute Feb 04
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 04
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 03
Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Feb 05

Wesley J. Landaker

Re: License of oui.txt file? Feb 08

Yorick Cool

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 01
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Feb 02
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Feb 15
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Feb 14
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Feb 15

Zephaniah E. Hull

Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Feb 14

The last update was on 16:53 GMT Wed May 01. There are 475 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc