Re: Affero General Public License
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
It seems that web.py does not include the source transmission facility
mentioned in the AGPL. As a result, the additional clause is void,
and the license should be DFSG-free.
This is an interesting question. Is a work free if some modifications are
permitted, but would make the resulting work non-free? If I add the
capability to web.py to deliver full source, that derived work would be
I'd lean toward non-free because the license restriction triggers
automatically if a derived work adds that functionality. But I'll admit
this is a twist I haven't fully digested.
Mark Rafn firstname.lastname@example.org <http://www.dagon.net/>