Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?

[Måns Rullgård <mru@inprovide.com>]

Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> writes:

> Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>> Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Oh, it's possible, the section just ends up as unreadable garbage.
>>>Nothing in the GFDL requires that the invariant sections be
>>>readable.
>> 
>> 
>> Well, actually, its not because devices easily barf on things that
>> aren't ASCII.
>> 
>> And, further, the GFDL says I must preserve invariant sections
>> "unaltered in their text", not "unaltered in their octects"; I seriously
>> doubt that'd count...
> Mmm, I guess you're right.

But then transliterating to ASCII must be acceptable.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com