Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?
Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>> Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>>>Oh, it's possible, the section just ends up as unreadable garbage.
>>>Nothing in the GFDL requires that the invariant sections be
>> Well, actually, its not because devices easily barf on things that
>> aren't ASCII.
>> And, further, the GFDL says I must preserve invariant sections
>> "unaltered in their text", not "unaltered in their octects"; I seriously
>> doubt that'd count...
> Mmm, I guess you're right.
But then transliterating to ASCII must be acceptable.