Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:47:02AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > Seeing as that is a void condition which is totally unenforceable, the
> > license is just the same as if the condition were inexistent, so yeah,
> > it's as good as free.
> Do you just want to nitpick and distract from what little conversation there
> is here? Do you have a response to his actual point (that "convenience"
> arguments are a weak attempt to ignore non-free restrictions, which can be
> applied to almost anything)?
If that was his point, he picked a very bad example. His exmaple license
would fail on discrimination before convenience even became a factor.
As far as the "convenience arguments", as I pointed out earlier, the
differences between freedom and convenience are quite clearly delineated in
the dictionary, and attempts to conflate the two do not make for compelling
Adam McKenna <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>