Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free
olive <email@example.com> wrote:
> By the way, there are licenses which in my opinion more clearly violates
> the DFSGL and are nevertheless accepted. I think of a license of a file
> in x.org which prohibit to export it to Cuba. This seems clearly be a
> discrimination and moreover it fails the dissident test (even if in this
> case the dissidant might be a U.S citizen; not a chinese one). For
> someone (like me) living outside the U.S. this is even more flagrant
> because to export goods to Cuba is perfectly legal from my country.
Which license is this? I ran
find /usr/share/doc/ -name copyright | xargs -n 100 grep -i cuba
and did not find anything. Running a google search on
packages.debian.org also did not find anything.