*To*: debian-legal@lists.debian.org*Cc*: debian-vote@lists.debian.org*Subject*: Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?*From*: olive <olive.lin@versateladsl.be>*Date*: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:29:37 +0400*Message-id*: <[🔎] dss0sr$jlb$1@sea.gmane.org>*In-reply-to*: <[🔎] d0461dbe0602131435v4ed9642dta9ddd1d2a5c83f4f@mail.gmail.com>*References*: <20060208223330.GA10870@debian.inet> <20060209211845.GC5830@debian.inet> <87u0b8b56p.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20060209214821.GA5978@debian.inet> <[🔎] 43EFD358.3050600@derobert.net> <[🔎] 20060213011518.GU9046@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 87mzgw2gye.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060213014711.GV9046@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 87ek27oy0s.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 20060213215047.GY9046@taz.net.au> <[🔎] d0461dbe0602131435v4ed9642dta9ddd1d2a5c83f4f@mail.gmail.com>

Raul Miller wrote:

On 2/13/06, Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> wrote:you people never give up, do you? as soon as one bogus claim against the GFDL is disproved, you recycle another one that was demolished months, weeks, or only days ago. repeat ad nauseum.Another possibility is that you're begging the question. (Begging the question means: assuming your conclusion is true in your argument about why the conclusion is true.) How about we try a different approach: Let's say that we want GFDL'd documentation to be a part of main. (That's going to be true for at least some people in the project.) How do we describe what it is that we want? Do we need to keep an arbitrary list of licenses, and everything that's on that list is "OK"? Do we just want to use the non-free criteria (everything that we can legally distribute)?

[...]

[...]

Olive

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com>

**References**:**A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>

**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>

**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>

**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>

**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>

**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>

**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?***From:*Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?** - Next by Date:
**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?** - Next by thread:
**Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?** - Index(es):