Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:29:59AM +0100, Yorick Cool wrote:
> > Climbing a 4,000 foot mountain is certainly possible. Its just
> > inconvenient [well, unless you do that kind of stuff for fun].
> > Personally, I do not find this license to be free, even though its just
> > a "convenience" issue.
> Seeing as that is a void condition which is totally unenforceable, the
> license is just the same as if the condition were inexistent, so yeah,
> it's as good as free.
Do you just want to nitpick and distract from what little conversation there
is here? Do you have a response to his actual point (that "convenience"
arguments are a weak attempt to ignore non-free restrictions, which can be
applied to almost anything)?