[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?

On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:13:59PM +0400, olive wrote:
> To answer, Patrick remark; a search in this list will show you that I 
> have considerably discussed and defended my opinion even if I do not 
> agree with most of the posters.

You have?  You elided the bulk of Don's response wholesale, and your
arguments often seem to reduce to poorly-defended assertions of what
you think the DFSG should mean.

And to repeat myself from a response to a previous poster making your

> This is just more wedging, trying to abuse the fact that Debian allows
> invariant license texts to squeeze in other invariant stuff.
> I would suggest anyone engaging in such wedging carefully reevaluate
> whether what they're doing is really in the best interests of Debian;
> or whether they're just trying to contrive a way to pound Debian into
> "agreement" with the FSF.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00493.html

Glenn Maynard

Reply to: