Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions
- To: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>
- Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions
- From: Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:30:51 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] e52efbe10602091130u9b0b743l478374175e4b1bb@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <e52efbe10601140613q49138e41tab237f35b3d77c8c@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <m2n.1EwlSh-007ECz@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <E1EwllA-0007PX-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20060112234112.GX17438@zewt.org> <E1ExCSq-0000xI-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20060113003346.GA5850@suffields.me.uk> <e52efbe10601130656u7b220c53r527f5d84c53fdcae@mail.gmail.com> <43C886FA.10509@derobert.net> <e52efbe10601140613q49138e41tab237f35b3d77c8c@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/14/06, Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/14/06, Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net> wrote:
> > We should start a "betting pool"[0] on when Wallace v. FSF will be
> > dismissed (again).
>
> I bet EURO 50 (through PayPal) that the FSF is going to lose it
> once again and won't get dismissal with prejudice through that
> motion.
I bet another EURO 50 (through PayPal) that Red Hat and Novell are
also going to lose and won't get dismissal under 12(b)(6).
http://www.terekhov.de/Wallace_v_Red_Hat_2nd_ANSWER.pdf
Hey GNUtians, let's play.
regards,
alexander.
Reply to: