On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:26:10AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:47:32PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > On 2/14/06, John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:01:05PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > > > But we all know that the GPL is a license-not-a-contract, and so UCC > > > > and related case law simply doesn't apply. > > > Do we? I thought that a license was a contract. > > Everyone who is neither blind nor an idiot knows for certain that the > > GPL is a *LICENSE NOT A CONTRACT* -- Richard Stallman and Eben Moglen > > have clarified that fact at least a hundred times. > What purpose do you feel calling a person "blind" or an "idiot" serves? > I don't think you are contributing anything to this discussion. He's not. Would you please killfile him so that we can get on with life? :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature