debian-legal Feb 2006 by thread

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Pavel Šimerda

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive

Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Yorick Cool

Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Glenn Maynard
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Glenn Maynard
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Yorick Cool
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Glenn Maynard
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Jeremy Hankins
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Walter Landry
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Patrick Herzig
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free MJ Ray
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Don Armstrong
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Walter Landry
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Steve Langasek
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Don Armstrong
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Don Armstrong
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Brian M. Carlson
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free MJ Ray
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Walter Landry
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Mark Rafn
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive
Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Don Armstrong

Re: Trademark policy for packages? Simon Josefsson

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Trademark policy for packages? Simon Josefsson

Re: Trademark policy for packages? Henning Makholm

Re: Trademark policy for packages? Nathanael Nerode

Re: Trademark policy for packages? Glenn Maynard

Re: Trademark policy for packages? Florian Weimer

Re: Trademark policy for packages? Glenn Maynard

Re: Anti-DMCA clause (was Re: GPL v3 Draft Nathanael Nerode

Re: Anti-DMCA clause (was Re: GPL v3 Draft Florian Weimer

Re: Anti-DMCA clause (was Re: GPL v3 Draft Nathanael Nerode

are PHP license 3.0 or 3.1 compatible with Debian ? José Carlos do Nascimento Medeiros

Re: are PHP license 3.0 or 3.1 compatible with Debian ? Alexander Schmehl

Re: are PHP license 3.0 or 3.1 compatible with Debian ? Francesco Poli

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Charles Fry

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages José Carlos do Nascimento Medeiros

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Charles Fry

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Don Armstrong
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Marco d'Itri
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Don Armstrong
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Andrew Donnellan
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Andrew Donnellan
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Steve Langasek
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Steve Langasek
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Marco d'Itri
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Charles Fry
please update the license text Charles Fry
Re: please update the license text Francesco Poli

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Steve Langasek

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Charles Fry

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Joerg Jaspert

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Andrew Donnellan
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Steve Langasek

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Joerg Jaspert
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Charles Fry
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Steve Langasek
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Steve Langasek
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Charles Fry

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages Francesco Poli

Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Andrew Donnellan

Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Glenn Maynard

Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Andrew Donnellan

Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Andrew Donnellan

Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Francesco Poli
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Nathanael Nerode
Re: Squiz.net Open Source License - is it free? Nathanael Nerode

gpl and hosted apps David M . Besonen

Re: gpl and hosted apps Mark Rafn

Re: gpl and hosted apps David M . Besonen

Re: gpl and hosted apps Mark Rafn

Re: gpl and hosted apps Glenn Maynard

Re: gpl and hosted apps David M . Besonen

Re: gpl and hosted apps Glenn Maynard
Re: gpl and hosted apps David M . Besonen
Re: gpl and hosted apps Glenn Maynard
Re: gpl and hosted apps David M . Besonen
Re: gpl and hosted apps David M . Besonen
Re: gpl and hosted apps Mark Rafn
Re: gpl and hosted apps Francesco Poli
Re: gpl and hosted apps Mark Rafn
Re: gpl and hosted apps Steve Langasek

Re: gpl and hosted apps Josh Triplett

Re: gpl and hosted apps David M . Besonen

Re: gpl and hosted apps Josh Triplett

Re: gpl and hosted apps Bernhard R. Link

libgsm: right to distribute Simon Neininger

Re: libgsm: right to distribute Michael Poole
Re: libgsm: right to distribute Walter Landry
Re: libgsm: right to distribute Moritz Muehlenhoff

Re: libgsm: right to distribute Glenn Maynard

Re: libgsm: right to distribute Alexander Terekhov

Re: libgsm: right to distribute Alexander Terekhov

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries bug1

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Alexander Terekhov

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries bug1

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Alexander Terekhov

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Walter Landry

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Alexander Terekhov

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Josh Triplett

Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries Alexander Terekhov

question about Debian-Logo Steffen Hoffmann
Re: Anton's amendment Hubert Chan

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Anton's amendment Hubert Chan

MIT License are DFSG complicant ? José Carlos do Nascimento Medeiros

Re: MIT License are DFSG complicant ? Justin Pryzby
Re: MIT License are DFSG complicant ? Luca Brivio

Affero General Public License Kai Hendry

Re: Affero General Public License Steve Langasek

Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill

Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License MJ Ray
GPLv3 Drafting Process Benj. Mako Hill
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Don Armstrong
GPLv3 Drafting Process MJ Ray
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Don Armstrong
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process MJ Ray
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Benj. Mako Hill
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPLv3 Drafting Process Alexander Terekhov
Re: Affero General Public License Josh Triplett
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Can Affero-like limitations be free? Mark Rafn
Re: Affero General Public License Josh Triplett
Re: Affero General Public License Marco d'Itri
Re: Affero General Public License Steve Langasek
Re: Affero General Public License Marco d'Itri
Re: Affero General Public License MJ Ray
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Marco d'Itri
Re: Affero General Public License Patrick Herzig
Re: Affero General Public License MJ Ray
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Bill Allombert
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Jeremy Hankins
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Jeremy Hankins
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Jeremy Hankins
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Lasse Reichstein Nielsen
Re: Affero General Public License Jeremy Hankins
Message not available
Re: Affero General Public License Jeremy Hankins
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Jeremy Hankins
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Anthony Towns
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Gervase Markham
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Josh Triplett
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Francesco Poli
Re: Affero General Public License Mark Rafn
Re: Affero General Public License Marco d'Itri
Re: Affero General Public License Mark Rafn

Re: Affero General Public License Florian Weimer

Re: Affero General Public License Mark Rafn
Re: Affero General Public License Florian Weimer
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard

Re: Affero General Public License Marco d'Itri

Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Josh Triplett
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Josh Triplett
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Mark Rafn
Re: Affero General Public License Glenn Maynard
Re: Affero General Public License Josh Triplett
Re: Affero General Public License Benj. Mako Hill
Re: Affero General Public License Mark Rafn
GPLv3 affero-compatibility (Re: Affero General Public License) Mark Rafn
Re: GPLv3 affero-compatibility (Re: Affero General Public License) Steve Langasek
Re: GPLv3 affero-compatibility (Re: Affero General Public License) Mark Rafn
Re: Affero General Public License Marco d'Itri
Re: Affero General Public License Mark Rafn
Re: Affero General Public License Marco d'Itri
Re: Affero General Public License Steve Langasek

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Re: Affero General Public License Nathanael Nerode
Re: Re: Affero General Public License Nathanael Nerode

Re: Affero General Public License olive
Re: Affero General Public License Matthew Woodcraft

Re: Affero General Public License Nathanael Nerode

KDE application relicensing Regis Boudin

Re: KDE application relicensing Glenn Maynard

Re: KDE application relicensing Regis Boudin

Re: KDE application relicensing Glenn Maynard

ICCLEIYSIUYA -license Juhapekka Tolvanen

Re: ICCLEIYSIUYA -license Henning Makholm

example of unacceptable invariant section (was Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Nathanael Nerode

Re: example of unacceptable invariant section (was Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free olive

Re: example of unacceptable invariant section (was Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free Francesco Poli

License of oui.txt file? Uwe Hermann

Re: License of oui.txt file? Wesley J. Landaker

Re: License of oui.txt file? Uwe Hermann
Re: License of oui.txt file? Lionel Elie Mamane

[DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Jari Aalto

Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice JC Helary

Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Glenn Maynard

Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Mahesh T. Pai
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Steve Langasek

Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Jari Aalto

Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Mahesh T. Pai
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Glenn Maynard
Re: [DSFG] question: Custom hand written notice Steve Langasek

FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Felix Kühling

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Rich Walker
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Matthew Palmer

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Sune Vuorela

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Rich Walker
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Matthew Palmer
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Patrick Herzig
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Don Armstrong
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Francesco Poli
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Sebastian Wieseler
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Alexander Terekhov
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Glenn Maynard
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Sebastian Wieseler
Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Glenn Maynard

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation Felix Kühling

Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation MJ Ray

Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions Alexander Terekhov

Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions Anthony DeRobertis

Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions Alexander Terekhov

Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions Andrew Donnellan

Re: Moglen's "all good faith" Alexander Terekhov
Re: Adobe open source license -- is this licence free? Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Adobe open source license -- is this licence free? Glenn Maynard

legal residence for corporations Nathanael Nerode

Re: legal residence for corporations Mahesh T. Pai

Re: legal residence for corporations Alexander Terekhov

A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anthony DeRobertis

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Craig Sanders

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Thomas Bushnell BSG

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Craig Sanders
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Craig Sanders
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Frank Küster
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Frank Küster
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Hubert Chan
The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Craig Sanders
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Craig Sanders
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Anthony DeRobertis
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Craig Sanders
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Anthony DeRobertis
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Zephaniah E. Hull
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill Sven Luther
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Hubert Chan
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Craig Sanders
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Hubert Chan
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Craig Sanders
Re: The Curious Case Of The Mountainous Molehill (was Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections?) Hubert Chan
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Florian Weimer
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Craig Sanders
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Raul Miller
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Don Armstrong
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Patrick Herzig
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Patrick Herzig
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Raul Miller
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Raul Miller
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Raul Miller
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Raul Miller
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Henning Makholm
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Raul Miller
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anton Zinoviev
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anthony DeRobertis

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Manoj Srivastava

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Craig Sanders
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Hamish Moffatt
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Peter Samuelson
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Hamish Moffatt
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Craig Sanders
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? olive
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Manoj Srivastava
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Craig Sanders
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Craig Sanders
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Sanjoy Mahajan
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Joe Smith
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Joe Smith
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Hubert Chan
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anthony DeRobertis

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anthony DeRobertis

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anton Zinoviev
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Yorick Cool

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Yorick Cool
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Glenn Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anthony DeRobertis

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Nathanael Nerode

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Adam McKenna

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Nathanael Nerode

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Kalle Kivimaa
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Anthony DeRobertis

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Gledd Maynard
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Nathanael Nerode
Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Måns Rullgård

Re: Dispossessing the FSF Martin Schulze
copyright law vs. license text (Was: Honesty in Debian) Daniel Ruoso

Re: copyright law vs. license text (Was: Honesty in Debian) Stuart Yeates
Re: copyright law vs. license text (Was: Honesty in Debian) C Shore
Re: copyright law vs. license text Mahesh T. Pai

Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov

Re: GPL v3 Draft John Goerzen

Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov

Re: GPL v3 Draft John Goerzen
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Steve Langasek
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Michael Poole
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft olive
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft olive
Re: GPL v3 Draft Alexander Terekhov
Re: GPL v3 Draft Stephen Gran

EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Yorick Cool

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Ville Oksanen
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Yorick Cool
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Yorick Cool
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) olive

Re: EU antitrust is also cool Frank Küster

Re: EU antitrust is also cool Yorick Cool
Re: EU antitrust is also cool olive
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Alexander Terekhov
Re: EU antitrust is also cool olive
Re: EU antitrust is also cool Alexander Terekhov
Re: EU antitrust is also cool olive

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) olive

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Michael Poole

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) olive
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Nathanael Nerode

Re: EU antitrust is also cool (was: A new practical problem...) Alexander Terekhov

A tool for checking licenses Ville Oksanen

Re: A tool for checking licenses Francesco Poli

Re: Regarding partner Jim Westveer

Re: Regarding partner Steve Langasek

Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Simon Josefsson

Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Steve Langasek

Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Simon Josefsson
Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Frank Küster

Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Steve Langasek

Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Marco d'Itri

Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Simon Josefsson
Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Mark Rafn

portaudio in Debian, license updates? Junichi Uekawa

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Matt Brubeck

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Junichi Uekawa
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Ross Bencina

Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Markus Meyer
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Ross Bencina
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Bjorn Roche
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? tim hall
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Robert McGwier
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Matt Brubeck
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? tim hall
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Ross Bencina
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Don Armstrong

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Josh Triplett

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Junichi Uekawa

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? tim hall

Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Stephen Gran

Missing documentation for autoconf Simon Huerlimann

Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Frank Küster

Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Frank Küster

Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Simon Huerlimann
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf olive
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Brian M. Carlson
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf olive
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Brian M. Carlson
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf olive
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Patrick Herzig
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Frank Küster
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Josh Triplett
Re: Missing documentation for autoconf Andrew Donnellan

Re: Missing documentation for autoconf MJ Ray

gnome-vfs daemon, GPL and LGPL Josselin Mouette

Re: gnome-vfs daemon, GPL and LGPL Lionel Elie Mamane

Re: gnome-vfs daemon, GPL and LGPL Alexander Terekhov

upstream license patched in debian package Kel Modderman

Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Eduard Bloch

Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Alexander Terekhov
Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Kel Modderman

Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Michael Poole
changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Eduard Bloch
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Kel Modderman
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Eduard Bloch
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Alexander Terekhov
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Eduard Bloch
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Don Armstrong
Re: changing upstream's MODULE_LICENSE string in module source Alexander Terekhov

Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Marco d'Itri

Re: Bug#354216: upstream license patched in debian package Alexander Terekhov

��m�点�ł� nororika

The last update was on 16:53 GMT Wed May 01. There are 475 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc