[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code

On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:

It looks fine to me, but if it's still a draft then I think it would be
useful to use a wording less vague than "misleading author or version

Agreed. It's fine to say that the package must be labelled as to modifications made, but this phrasing seems to open the door to api-level requirements (like the filename or in-code version string cannot be "misleading", whatever that means).
Mark Rafn    dagon@dagon.net    <http://www.dagon.net/>

Reply to: