Re: GPL v3 Draft

To: Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GPL v3 Draft
From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:30:26 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060214153026.GA28926@excelhustler.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] e52efbe10602140701i27916492h2192242593869dc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20060116170742.GA21981@archimedes.ucr.edu> <87mzhvpxbf.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20060117075243.GA26210@rzlab.ucr.edu> <e52efbe10601170155o78476c81oda4aac35eadcd9d5@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] e52efbe10602140701i27916492h2192242593869dc@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:01:05PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> But we all know that the GPL is a license-not-a-contract, and so UCC
> and related case law simply doesn't apply.

Do we?  I thought that a license was a contract.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL v3 Draft
  - From: Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: GPL v3 Draft
  - From: Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: GPL v3 Draft
Next by Date: Re: GPL v3 Draft
Previous by thread: Re: GPL v3 Draft
Next by thread: Re: GPL v3 Draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread