Re: FYI: Savannah forces new projects to use GFDL for documentation
Sune Vuorela <email@example.com> writes:
> On 2006-02-09, Matthew Palmer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> What really got me saying "whoa!" though is the blog post linked from the
>> ticket comments -- the fourth paragraph seems to say that Savannah changed
>> it's policy because Debian doesn't think the GFDL is DFSG-free. Worrying,
>> if true.
> The blog entry is now gone. Any one got a copy ?
The policy statement in the FAQ seems to have changed:
>For documentation, we are currently clarifying exactly what licenses we
>accept. Of course, we accept our GNU Free Documentation License (and
>compatibles), even if it is not compatible with the GNU GPL.
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | email@example.com
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487