debian-legal Jan 2005 by subject
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Fax NÃO enviada para ''
[gnu.org #219101] Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools
[ralph.roth@hp.com: RE: Including cfg2html in Debian]
And at night, the flaming foxes come...
anonymity and copyright in the U.S. (was: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test)
Are drawings of products trademark infringements?
AROS License DFSG ok?
Re: Bug#284190: ITP: drdsl -- DSL Assistant for AVM DSL/ISDN-Controllers
Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files
Bug#288233: Possible license issues
Re: Bug#288429: asterisk: Hold music are not DFSG-free
Re: Bug#289764: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Re: Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license
Re: Bug#290087: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file
Re: Bug#292260: Should be moved from non-free to main
Bug#292629: libapache-mod-aspseek: GPLed module for a GPL-incompatible webserver (Apache)
cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL
Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License
D-Link wireless adapter firmware
Re: Dealing with drivers that need firmware on the filesystem
Does GPL allow that? (not theorhetical)
Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2)
Draft: Graphviz summary
Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? [END]
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal
Re: GCJ vs. Kaffe linking
GCJ vs. Kaffe linking [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe]
Re: GCJ vs. Kaffe linking [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe]
GNU Classpath based execution environments (Was: Eclipse 3.0)
GPL - "specifying" the preferred form for modification
Re: GPL and Copyright Law
GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe)
GPL and CPL/APL are NOT compatible (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe)
GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Re: GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free
Re: handling Mozilla with kid gloves [was: GUADEC report]
how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file
Hypothetical situation to chew on
The last update was on 08:32 GMT Sun May 19. There are 1053 messages. Page 1 of 3.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc