debian-legal Jan 2005 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 3 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Fax NÃO enviada para '' [gnu.org #219101] Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools [ralph.roth@hp.com: RE: Including cfg2html in Debian] And at night, the flaming foxes come... anonymity and copyright in the U.S. (was: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test) Are drawings of products trademark infringements? AROS License DFSG ok? Re: Bug#284190: ITP: drdsl -- DSL Assistant for AVM DSL/ISDN-Controllers Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files Bug#288233: Possible license issues Re: Bug#288429: asterisk: Hold music are not DFSG-free Re: Bug#289764: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Re: Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license Re: Bug#290087: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Re: Bug#292260: Should be moved from non-free to main Bug#292629: libapache-mod-aspseek: GPLed module for a GPL-incompatible webserver (Apache) cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License D-Link wireless adapter firmware Re: Dealing with drivers that need firmware on the filesystem Does GPL allow that? (not theorhetical) Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2) Draft: Graphviz summary Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? [END] Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Re: GCJ vs. Kaffe linking GCJ vs. Kaffe linking [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe] Re: GCJ vs. Kaffe linking [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe] GNU Classpath based execution environments (Was: Eclipse 3.0) GPL - "specifying" the preferred form for modification Re: GPL and Copyright Law GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) GPL and CPL/APL are NOT compatible (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe) GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works? Re: GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free Re: handling Mozilla with kid gloves [was: GUADEC report] how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Hypothetical situation to chew on The last update was on 08:32 GMT Sun May 19. There are 1053 messages. Page 1 of 3.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 3
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc