Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Andrew Suffield <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 07:08:23PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> So you are basically saying that aiding or hinting the end-user to
>> create these would-be derivative works is enough to be violating the
> That's overstated. It's enough to have to argue the point in court and
> be unsure of the result, which is bad enough that we can't really go
>> Then how can things like thepiratebay.org be legal?
> They aren't with any degree of certainty.
It's certain enough that Microsoft have failed to shut them down.