Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal
Mike Hommey wrote:
Is there really a big difference? Is there a separate copyright license for the
icons other than the trademark document that this whole discussion is about? I
remove the icons in order to distribute it in main. Same would be true for the
So, if we find out that we have to change the trademarks in order to put it into
main, why is it enough to remove the trademarks during build, while it is needed
to remove the icons in advance?
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:53:37AM +0100, Alexander Sack <email@example.com> wrote:
But again, for me it is still unclear if we need to patch the orig.tar.gz
in advance. I would think so; we currently remove the icons anyway, so IMHO
removing all other trademarks would be necessary too, right?
Removing trademarks is not the reason why you remove the icons in the
orig.tar.gz. The reason is that the icons are not free.
I just don't see the line.
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal
firstname.lastname@example.org | `. `' Operating System
http://www.jwsdot.com/ | `- http://www.debian.org/