Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Måns Rullgård <email@example.com> wrote:
> Walter Landry <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > What if there was a package wget++ that communicated with openssl
> > entirely through system() or exec() calls? It would construct
> > appropriate input and parse openssl's output. Would that constitute
> > linking? It ends up using all of the same code as the directly linked
> > version.
> The Gnus newsreader, running under Emacs, does precisely this, and has
> done so for many years.
> > If it is not linking, why couldn't you do this with all GPL'd
> > libraries? You could write a GPL'd wrapper around a library, and just
> > use the wrapper with exec().
> A while back, the general agreement seemed to be that this would be
I don't doubt you, but when was that? It would be good to see
> > In essence, why does using exec() suddenly break the chain, while a
> > linker or classloader does not?
> I don't see an obvious difference, but the GPL FAQ does mention this
I think this is really the point of contention. There is no good
reason to say that exec() is a magic boundary. That is why I don't
see the difference between linking in the C sense and calling
libraries through an interpreter.