Re: AROS License DFSG ok?

[Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:47:36PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Again, this clause is part of the MPL, which is presently considered
>> DFSG-free.
> 
> No, the MPL is not clearly free[1].  See
> 
>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00221.html

The reasons used for declaring the MPL non-free are either not embodied
in the DFSG, or are based on an interpretation of DFSG 3 that I disagree
with. It may not be clearly free, but it's certainly not clearly
non-free.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org