debian-legal Jan 2005 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 3

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Aurélien Jarno

Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? [END] Jan 11

Claus Färber

Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 12
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 12
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 12

Frank Küster

Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works? Jan 31
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works? Jan 31
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works? Jan 31
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works? Jan 31
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works? Jan 31
GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works? Jan 28
Re: GPL - "specifying" the preferred form for modification Jan 31

Gürkan Sengün

AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 06

Loïc Minier

Re: Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license Jan 21
Re: Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license Jan 21

Måns Rullgård

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 26
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 20
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 22
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 19
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 22
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 27
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13

Adeodato Simó

Al Stone

Re: Is the LLVM Release License DFSG-compatible? Jan 05
Is the LLVM Release License DFSG-compatible? Jan 05

Alexander Sack

Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 05
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 10
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks Jan 01

Andreas Barth

Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Jan 05
Re: Bug#288429: asterisk: Hold music are not DFSG-free Jan 04

Andreas Brakoulias

Re: Using the Term Debian, DWN 04Jan05 - www.debianshop.com Jan 07

Andres Baravalle

Is phpGrabComics legal? Jan 21
Re: Is phpGrabComics legal? Jan 26
Re: Is phpGrabComics legal? Jan 22
Re: Is phpGrabComics legal? Jan 22

Andrew Suffield

Re: D-Link wireless adapter firmware Jan 31
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 05
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 11
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 05
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 12
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 08
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 06
Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Jan 14
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 08
Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses Jan 31
Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Jan 14
Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses (was ' Re: Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license') Jan 26
Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 07
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 11
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Jan 08
Re: More mmcache concerns Jan 06
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Some missing facts Jan 17
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 04
Re: SableVM/Kaffe pissing contest (Was: GPL and Copyright Law) Jan 18
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 13
Re: SableVM/Kaffe pissing contest (Was: GPL and Copyright Law) Jan 17
Re: Some missing facts Jan 17
Re: Draft: Graphviz summary Jan 26
Re: Strange restrictions Jan 03
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 08
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 02
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works? Jan 29
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 05
Re: SableVM/Kaffe pissing contest (Was: GPL and Copyright Law) Jan 20
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 12
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 07
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 17
Strange restrictions Jan 02
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 02
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13

Anibal Monsalve Salazar

Re: new .deb was done Jan 25

Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 13
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 06
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 06
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 06
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 13
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 13

antonio

telemovel Jan 27

Arnoud Engelfriet

Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 07
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 07

Aurelien Jarno

Re: Bug#289764: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11
Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 10
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11

Bart Warmerdam

Re: Bug#288233: Possible license issues Jan 02

Batist Paklons

Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 06
Re: OT: GPL section 4 termination clause Jan 14
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 08
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 11

Bernhard R. Link

Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Jan 09
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Jan 11
Question about GFDL Jan 07

Bill Allombert

Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 17

Bjoern

why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 10

Branden Robinson

a right to privacy is not in the DFSG, therfore you don't have one Jan 31
Re: Request for IPR review Jan 11
anonymity and copyright in the U.S. (was: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test) Jan 31

Brett Parker

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 19
Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Jan 14
Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Jan 14

Brian Masinick

Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free ? Jan 05

Brian Nelson

Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13
Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13
Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 14
Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13
Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13
Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13
Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13
Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13

Brian Ristuccia

Re: Is phpGrabComics legal? Jan 22

Brian Thomas Sniffen

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 08
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 04
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 11
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 06
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 11
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Jan 08
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: GCJ vs. Kaffe linking Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 19
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 19
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 01
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Jan 12
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Jan 12
Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Jan 08
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 19
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Jan 05
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 12
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 19
Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Jan 14
Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Jan 12
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 08
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 10
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 02
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 08
Re: SableVM/Kaffe pissing contest Jan 19
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 11
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 08
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 11

Byju_Michael

unsubscribe Jan 18

Christian Höltje

Re: Mozilla name suggestions Jan 05

Christian Kirbach

D-Link wireless adapter firmware Jan 28

Christopher Lawrence

OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Jan 13
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Jan 07
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Jan 08
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Jan 12
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Jan 06
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Jan 11
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Jan 04
OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Jan 10

Dalibor Topic

Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 29
Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: Some missing facts (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: GPL and Copyright Law Jan 17
Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
This is old FUD (Was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: SableVM/Kaffe pissing contest Jan 17
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 17
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 12
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: No obscenes, please! [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe] Jan 16
Re: SableVM/Kaffe pissing contest Jan 17
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Some missing facts (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 16

Daniel Goldsmith

Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 13
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 12

Daniel Kobras

Re: Bug#292260: Should be moved from non-free to main Jan 26

Darren Salt

Re: LCC and blobs Jan 04
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 04
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 04

Dave Harding

Re: Strange restrictions Jan 02

David Nusinow

Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 11
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 11

David Schleef

Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13

David Turner

[gnu.org #219101] Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Jan 12

Decklin Foster

Re: Using "debian extended xterminal (dext)" as name for a project. Jan 01

Don Armstrong

Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 02
Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test Jan 21
Re: Status of icons in latex2html Jan 27
Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Jan 13
Re: Status of icons in latex2html Jan 28
Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test Jan 21
Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC and blobs] Jan 09
Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test Jan 21
Re: Bug#292260: Should be moved from non-free to main Jan 26
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 05
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 06
Re: anonymity and copyright in the U.S. (was: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test) Jan 31
Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Jan 13
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 08
Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test Jan 21

Elizabeth Fong

More mmcache concerns Jan 06
Re: More mmcache concerns Jan 09

Eric Dorland

Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 20
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks Jan 03
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 21
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 22

Etienne Gagnon

Some missing facts (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 16
Re: Some missing facts (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 16
Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: SableVM/Kaffe pissing contest (Was: GPL and Copyright Law) Jan 17

Evan Prodromou

Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2) Jan 12

Fabio Tranchitella

phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Jan 05

Faxination

Fax NÃO enviada para '' Jan 05

Fedor Zuev

More mmcache concerns Jan 09

Florian Weimer

Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 12
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 06
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Jan 09
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 07
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 06
Re: More mmcache concerns Jan 06
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 07
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 07
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Jan 09
Re: More mmcache concerns Jan 06
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 07
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 14
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Jan 07
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 07

Francesco Poli

Re: anonymity and copyright in the U.S. (was: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test) Jan 31
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 04
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 06
Re: Draft: Graphviz summary Jan 26
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 08
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Jan 09
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 06
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Jan 09
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 21
Re: handling Mozilla with kid gloves [was: GUADEC report] Jan 26
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 06
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 02
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 16
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 02
Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files Jan 12
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 06
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 06
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 02
Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses Jan 30
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 03
Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2) Jan 12
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 19
Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test Jan 30
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 02
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 03
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 04
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 06
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 15
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 10
Re: handling Mozilla with kid gloves [was: GUADEC report] Jan 27
Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Jan 10

gentoo-gwn+owner

Post to gentoo-gwn@robin.gentoo.org denied Jan 24

Gervase Markham

Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 10
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 05
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 08
Re: Strange restrictions Jan 02
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 04
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 21
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 22
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 06
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 20
Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 13
Mozilla and Trademarks Jan 01
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 03
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 10
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks Jan 01
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 06
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 21
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 08
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 08
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 05
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 05
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 05
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 02
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free ? Jan 05
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 14
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 02
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks Jan 01

Glenn Maynard

Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 16
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 08
Re: The Nutch Software License Jan 31
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 01
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 08
Re: RFP: gtybalt -- computer algebra system (CAS) based on GiNaC with optional TeXmacs GUI Jan 21
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 14
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 16
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 07
GPL - "specifying" the preferred form for modification Jan 28
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 20
Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test Jan 21
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 07
Re: RFP: gtybalt -- computer algebra system (CAS) based on GiNaC with optional TeXmacs GUI Jan 21
Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Jan 14
Re: GPL - "specifying" the preferred form for modification Jan 29
Re: ReRegarding iraf Jan 10
Re: ReRegarding iraf Jan 10
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 06
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 14
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 13
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 05
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 10
Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Jan 14
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 05
Re: a right to privacy is not in the DFSG, therfore you don't have one Jan 31
Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses Jan 31
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Jan 06
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 05
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 17
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 11
Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Jan 14
Re: Is the LLVM Release License DFSG-compatible? Jan 05
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 06
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 13
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 07
Re: The Nutch Software License Jan 31
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 04
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 08
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 17
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 04
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 04
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 06
Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Jan 05
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 16
Re: GPL and Copyright Law (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Jan 17
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 04
Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Jan 11
Re: RFP: gtybalt -- computer algebra system (CAS) based on GiNaC with optional TeXmacs GUI Jan 21
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 20
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? [END] Jan 11
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 06
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 16
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 20
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 05
Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Jan 14
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 11
Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Jan 07
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 07
Re: ReRegarding iraf Jan 10

Grzegorz B. Prokopski

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Does GPL allow that? (not theorhetical) Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Illustrating JVM bindings Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 15
GCJ vs. Kaffe linking [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe] Jan 16
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 14
Does GPL allow that? (not theorhetical) Jan 12
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13
No obscenes, please! [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe] Jan 16
JVM = interpreter + VM bindings Jan 14
Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Jan 14
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Jan 13

Hamish Moffatt

Re: LCC and blobs Jan 01

Helen Faulkner

Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files Jan 11

Henning Makholm

Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test Jan 21
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 03
Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test Jan 21
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Jan 13
Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Jan 14
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 19
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 13
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Jan 03
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 01
Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Jan 14
Re: RFP: gtybalt -- computer algebra system (CAS) based on GiNaC with optional TeXmacs GUI Jan 20
Re: Trademarks: what is the line? Jan 03
Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Jan 14
Re: Non-free files in source packages? Jan 05
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 09
Re: prozilla: Nonfree Jan 13
Re: [ralph.roth@hp.com: RE: Including cfg2html in Debian] Jan 03
Re: Draft: Graphviz summary Jan 25
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 13
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 13
Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Jan 13
Re: Is phpGrabComics legal? Jan 23
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 07
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 13
Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free ? Jan 05
Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Jan 07
Re: Is phpGrabComics legal? Jan 22
Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Jan 12
Re: LCC and blobs Jan 01
Re: Mozilla and Trademarks Jan 01
Draft: Graphviz summary Jan 21
Re: [ralph.roth@hp.com: RE: Including cfg2html in Debian] Jan 03
Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Jan 20
Re: Slashem licensing terms Jan 19

Iassen Pramatarov

Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Jan 06

Jacobo Tarrio

Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jan 11
Re: ReRegarding iraf Jan 11

The last update was on 08:32 GMT Sun May 19. There are 1053 messages. Page 1 of 3.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 3

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc