debian-legal Apr 2004 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
(no subject) Automated Reply from candidat <candidat@www.pmebtp.com> Norton AntiVirus hat einen Virus in einer von Ihnen gesendeten Nachricht ermittelt. Die infizierte Anlage wurde gelöscht. [MailServer Notification] To Sender a virus was found and action taken. [OT] Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free? about licenses for 3D models Auto-Responder (info@mecanicimport.com) Re: bill Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-freefirmware Bug#242281: Problem with mush's license Bug#242895: drivers/usb/emi26_fw.h has a non-free license Bug#244289: xball: Package includes non-free source code. Re: CCPL-by Collection of approved licences in the wiki contracts vs. licenses, OSI, and Debian (was: The QPL licence) Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amib oot & .. Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & .. Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & .. Different classifications of non-free [Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free?] DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0 Re: DRAFT for a GR proposal concerning the Sarge release DRAFT summary of the CC-by, feedback requested firmwares in the 2.4.25 Linux kernel (Debian sources) Font source Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge Forgent starts litigating JPEG... Re: Freepats Get Cia:lis ES 7.5 Fast intimacy GPL and scripting languages (here: python2.3-psycopg) Re: GPL vs. OSL Have some Xana#x and you will have a blast, we've got it here . no que.stions asked Re: Here is the document How might I convince my school not to use this product? Is license text copyrightable? [was: Re: Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?] Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG? License violation in "new" Plex86 lookandfeel General Public License (LAFGPL) Mail delivery failure Mamografii gratuite Modifying an ISO Re: more evil firmwares found Re: mplayer Re: New summary: Binary peripheral software non-freeness of 4-clause BSD license (was: The QPL licence) Not inherently free, but inherently non-free? Online demonstration support against Software Patents? Re: Open Publication License pasqua Re: please release sarge instead of removing binary firmware Re: POSSIVEL SPAM-- Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? Postfach erloschen Problem with mush's license Problematic Software Licenses psmisc and POSIX compliance The purpose of debian-legal The QPL licence Question about DFSG and a THC project reiser4 non-free? Repost of the DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0 RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org SEPL (Swiss Ephemeris Public License) Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge Squeak in Debian? Stop feeling bad about yourself!! Summary of the CC-by Re: Summary wanted Summary wanted (was: Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?) Template Numerical Toolkit (TNT) license Votre message pour ue01_200310 a ete rejete The last update was on 07:18 GMT Sun May 15. There are 443 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc