debian-legal Apr 2004 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
about licenses for 3D models
Auto-Responder (info@mecanicimport.com)
Re: bill
Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-freefirmware
Bug#242281: Problem with mush's license
Bug#242895: drivers/usb/emi26_fw.h has a non-free license
Bug#244289: xball: Package includes non-free source code.
Re: CCPL-by
Collection of approved licences in the wiki
contracts vs. licenses, OSI, and Debian (was: The QPL licence)
Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & ..
Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amib oot & ..
Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & ..
Different classifications of non-free [Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free?]
DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0
Re: DRAFT for a GR proposal concerning the Sarge release
DRAFT summary of the CC-by, feedback requested
firmwares in the 2.4.25 Linux kernel (Debian sources)
Font source Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Forgent starts litigating JPEG...
Re: Freepats
Get Cia:lis ES 7.5 Fast intimacy
GPL and scripting languages (here: python2.3-psycopg)
Re: GPL vs. OSL
Have some Xana#x and you will have a blast, we've got it here . no que.stions asked
Re: Here is the document
How might I convince my school not to use this product?
Is license text copyrightable? [was: Re: Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?]
Automated Reply from candidat <candidat@www.pmebtp.com>
Norton AntiVirus hat einen Virus in einer von Ihnen gesendeten Nachricht ermittelt. Die infizierte Anlage wurde gelöscht.
Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?
License violation in "new" Plex86
lookandfeel General Public License (LAFGPL)
Mail delivery failure
[MailServer Notification] To Sender a virus was found and action taken.
Mamografii gratuite
Modifying an ISO
Re: more evil firmwares found
Re: mplayer
Re: New summary: Binary peripheral software
non-freeness of 4-clause BSD license (was: The QPL licence)
(no subject)
Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?
Online demonstration support against Software Patents?
Re: Open Publication License
[OT] Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?
pasqua
Re: please release sarge instead of removing binary firmware
Re: POSSIVEL SPAM-- Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Postfach erloschen
Problematic Software Licenses
Problem with mush's license
psmisc and POSIX compliance
The purpose of debian-legal
The QPL licence
Question about DFSG and a THC project
reiser4 non-free?
Repost of the DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0
RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org
SEPL (Swiss Ephemeris Public License)
Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Squeak in Debian?
Stop feeling bad about yourself!!
Summary of the CC-by
Re: Summary wanted
Summary wanted (was: Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?)
Template Numerical Toolkit (TNT) license
Votre message pour ue01_200310 a ete rejete
The last update was on 13:29 GMT Wed May 01. There are 443 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc