debian-legal Apr 2004 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
about licenses for 3D models Auto-Responder (info@mecanicimport.com) Re: bill Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? Re: Bug#239952: kernel-source-2.6.4: qla2xxx contains non-freefirmware Bug#242281: Problem with mush's license Bug#242895: drivers/usb/emi26_fw.h has a non-free license Bug#244289: xball: Package includes non-free source code. Re: CCPL-by Collection of approved licences in the wiki contracts vs. licenses, OSI, and Debian (was: The QPL licence) Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & .. Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amib oot & .. Re: Debian-installer, older hardware, boot loaders, miboot & amiboot & .. Different classifications of non-free [Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free?] DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0 Re: DRAFT for a GR proposal concerning the Sarge release DRAFT summary of the CC-by, feedback requested firmwares in the 2.4.25 Linux kernel (Debian sources) Font source Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge Forgent starts litigating JPEG... Re: Freepats Get Cia:lis ES 7.5 Fast intimacy GPL and scripting languages (here: python2.3-psycopg) Re: GPL vs. OSL Have some Xana#x and you will have a blast, we've got it here . no que.stions asked Re: Here is the document How might I convince my school not to use this product? Is license text copyrightable? [was: Re: Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?] Automated Reply from candidat <candidat@www.pmebtp.com> Norton AntiVirus hat einen Virus in einer von Ihnen gesendeten Nachricht ermittelt. Die infizierte Anlage wurde gelöscht. Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG? License violation in "new" Plex86 lookandfeel General Public License (LAFGPL) Mail delivery failure [MailServer Notification] To Sender a virus was found and action taken. Mamografii gratuite Modifying an ISO Re: more evil firmwares found Re: mplayer Re: New summary: Binary peripheral software non-freeness of 4-clause BSD license (was: The QPL licence) (no subject) Not inherently free, but inherently non-free? Online demonstration support against Software Patents? Re: Open Publication License [OT] Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free? pasqua Re: please release sarge instead of removing binary firmware Re: POSSIVEL SPAM-- Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? Postfach erloschen Problematic Software Licenses Problem with mush's license psmisc and POSIX compliance The purpose of debian-legal The QPL licence Question about DFSG and a THC project reiser4 non-free? Repost of the DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0 RFC: Debian License Information on www.debian.org SEPL (Swiss Ephemeris Public License) Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge Squeak in Debian? Stop feeling bad about yourself!! Summary of the CC-by Re: Summary wanted Summary wanted (was: Is OSL 2.0 compliant with DFSG?) Template Numerical Toolkit (TNT) license Votre message pour ue01_200310 a ete rejete The last update was on 13:29 GMT Wed May 01. There are 443 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc