[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[OT] Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?

On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 01:28:59AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> 	2) None of the proponents of this position came up with good
> 	   reasons why the freedoms we consider so important for software
> 	   don't apply to documentation.

That's easy.

So we can ship more shit in main.  W4R3Z G00D!  PR1NCIPULZ BAD!

Oh, wait.  You said *good* reasons.

Sorry.  :)

G. Branden Robinson                |    Religion consists in a set of
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    things which the average man thinks
branden@debian.org                 |    he believes and wishes he was
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    certain of.           -- Mark Twain

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: