Re: DRAFT d-l summary of the OSL v2.0
* Henning Makholm (email@example.com) [040423 01:25]:
> Scripsit Jeremy Hankins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Perhaps we should think about language to add to the DFSG for this
> > kind of case?
> I wish you luck. But we can never be sure that any formulation of the
> DFSG will describe exactly the next kind of non-freeness we come
I learned during university that any system which is not conflicting
itself has gaps in it. As the DFSG are not conflicting itself ....
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C