Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:10 -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
> Martin Schulze <email@example.com> wrote:
> > There seems to be some confusion about whether the GNU FDL renders
> > every document non-free or only those that include invariant
> > sections. The result is that... er... I am confused as well...
> > Could somebody enlighten me?
> When the GFDL was originally inspected, the conclusion was that the
> GFDL was free as long as there were no invariant sections (and maybe
> some other sections). Since then, other problems have been discovered
> that make all GFDL documents non-free.
I think most of them are summarised here.