[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Freepats

>>>>> "Ryan" == Ryan Underwood <nemesis-lists@icequake.net> writes:

    Ryan> I don't seem to be getting mail from the BTS on this bug.

You weren't listed in your mail-followup-to header, but I CCed you
anyway. Hmmm, I guess I should have CCed you at the start, sorry about
that (the BTS doesn't automatically send mail to the submitter).

    Ryan> Anyway, it seemed to me that the Creative Commons licenses
    Ryan> would be more appropriate since they were specifically
    Ryan> designed to cover media:

    Ryan> This one is just a MIT-ish license:
    Ryan> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/

    Ryan> This one is a LGPL-like license without going into details
    Ryan> of linking.  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/

As far as I can tell, with a quick glance at the summary, both of
these licenses should be OK as far as Debian is concerned.

I assume that the "Share Alike" clause wouldn't affect music created
with these files, as that seems to be the desired outcome.
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

Reply to: