On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 11:19:21PM +0000, W. Borgert wrote: > my understanding of the GPL is, that one can use GPLed > scripting language modules, such as python2.3-psycopg, in a > non-GPL, proprietory application, right? (As long as I give > away the module itself and any changes I might have done > under the GPL, of course.) Or do I have to use > python2.3-pgsql (BSD licensed) for that totally non-free > stuff? Smoke test: the resultant work must function without using any GPLed works (necessary, not sufficient, condition). That one disambiguates the vast majority of cases. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature