Re: Problematic Software Licenses
Scripsit Benjamin Cutler <email@example.com>
> The problem is that the first license is pretty obviously complete
> bunk, because it sounds like a purchased program, not a piece of
> source code released to the public. The second license seems to be
> less restrictive, but it's pretty vague at the same time.
I have read through your message several times, but did not find any
"second license". Did you forget to paste it in?
Henning Makholm "I ... I have to return some videos."