[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The QPL licence

On Apr 26, 2004, at 16:12, Glenn Maynard wrote:

I do seem to recall this, but I can't place it.  Does anyone remember a
license which was considered free, and had non-free but unenforcable

The only thing I can think of is the 4-clause BSD's advertising clause, which seems to be widely thought --- for reasons no one can discern --- to be unenforceable. [It'd be non-free because it contaminates other software, for example.]

Reply to: