[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Unfortunately, the draft position statement doesn't explain, which
> section of DFSG is violated in such a case and why. 

It actually does, for every single instance where -legal located a

Scroll down, and read carefully. [Or search for DFSG.]

Don Armstrong

It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might be wrong
 -- Chris Torek


Reply to: