Re: Not inherently free, but inherently non-free?
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Unfortunately, the draft position statement doesn't explain, which
> section of DFSG is violated in such a case and why.
It actually does, for every single instance where -legal located a
Scroll down, and read carefully. [Or search for DFSG.]
It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might be wrong
-- Chris Torek