Re: lookandfeel General Public License (LAFGPL)
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 02:53:24PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> that you call your license by another name and do not include the GPL
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> preamble, and provided you modify the instructions-for-use at the end enough
> ^^^^^^^^
> to make it clearly different in wording and not mention GNU (though the
> actual procedure you describe may be similar). "
>
> This preamble is very close to the GPL preamble; it's clearly a derivative
> work, since entire sentences are the same, others are only slightly
> changed, and the structure is identical. So it doesn't really satisfy the
> requirements given here. :-(
Did you not read the rest of the thread before replying? :)
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: