It's been several days with no activity in this thread. Can someone please summarize it? I realize the original specific instance motivating this discussion has been resolved (at least it appears that way), but I still think it's worthwhile for us to document why we find the OSL 2.0 DFSG-nonfree. Even leaving aside the termination-upon-patent-enforcement clause. -- G. Branden Robinson | As people do better, they start Debian GNU/Linux | voting like Republicans -- unless branden@debian.org | they have too much education and http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | vote Democratic. -- Karl Rove
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature