[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Summary wanted

Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:

> It's been several days with no activity in this thread.
> Can someone please summarize it?  I realize the original specific
> instance motivating this discussion has been resolved (at least it
> appears that way), but I still think it's worthwhile for us to document
> why we find the OSL 2.0 DFSG-nonfree.

If no one else gets to it, I can do it later this week.

> Even leaving aside the termination-upon-patent-enforcement clause.

It should probably at least be referred to in any summary, since it is
a rather important part of the discussion.

Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333  9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03

Reply to: