Re: Summary wanted
Branden Robinson <email@example.com> writes:
> It's been several days with no activity in this thread.
> Can someone please summarize it? I realize the original specific
> instance motivating this discussion has been resolved (at least it
> appears that way), but I still think it's worthwhile for us to document
> why we find the OSL 2.0 DFSG-nonfree.
If no one else gets to it, I can do it later this week.
> Even leaving aside the termination-upon-patent-enforcement clause.
It should probably at least be referred to in any summary, since it is
a rather important part of the discussion.
Jeremy Hankins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03