Re: lookandfeel General Public License (LAFGPL)
Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 02:53:24PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> that you call your license by another name and do not include the GPL
>> preamble, and provided you modify the instructions-for-use at the end
>> enough ^^^^^^^^
>> to make it clearly different in wording and not mention GNU (though the
>> actual procedure you describe may be similar). "
>> This preamble is very close to the GPL preamble; it's clearly a
>> derivative work, since entire sentences are the same, others are only
>> changed, and the structure is identical. So it doesn't really satisfy
>> requirements given here. :-(
> Did you not read the rest of the thread before replying? :)
Eh, sometimes I read, or receive, badly out of order. Sorry. :-(
There are none so blind as those who will not see.