[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lookandfeel General Public License (LAFGPL)

Glenn Maynard wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 02:53:24PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> that you call your license by another name and do not include the GPL
>>                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> preamble, and provided you modify the instructions-for-use at the end
>> enough ^^^^^^^^
>> to make it clearly different in wording and not mention GNU (though the
>> actual procedure you describe may be similar). "
>> This preamble is very close to the GPL preamble; it's clearly a
>> derivative work, since entire sentences are the same, others are only
>> slightly
>> changed, and the structure is identical.  So it doesn't really satisfy
>> the
>> requirements given here.  :-(
> Did you not read the rest of the thread before replying?  :)
Eh, sometimes I read, or receive, badly out of order.  Sorry.  :-(

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Reply to: