Re: lookandfeel General Public License (LAFGPL)
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 02:28:01AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> *Sigh* Unfortunately, it doesn't matter. The license itself appears to be a
> violation of the FSF's copyright in the preamble of the GPL; the FSF
> doesn't grant any right to modify that preamble, disgustingly enough. It's
> not legally safe to distribute the license text, so we can't very well
> distribute the software. Blech.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifyGPL says you can. I seem to
recall there being a conflicting statement elsewhere in the FAQ, but I can't
find it now.