debian-policy May 1999 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 2 >
[next page] 		[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Branden's contrib manifesto (was: Hey! Why does everybody love flaming so much? [was: `pure']) Bug#20373: PROPOSED] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel Bug#20373: PROPOSED] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel Bug#21585: PROPOSED] /etc/init.d/<script> need not be a conf Bug#21585: PROPOSED] /etc/init.d/<script> need not be a conffile if actively maintained Bug#21820: PROPOSED] bug in debian-emacs-policy.gz example script Bug#21875: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 23/04/1999] fixing nntpserver inconsitency) Bug#22518: marked as done ([PROPOSED] smartlist: don't die if /etc/aliases is not a file) Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs Bug#25882: PROPOSED] u/gid 100 should be statically allocated Bug#26159: PROPOSED] contact address for virtual package name list Bug#27869: PROPOSED] Icon location policy Bug#30148: marked as done ([PROPOSED]: List of current policy package maintainers should be public) Bug#30302: marked as done (Typos in policy) Bug#31033: marked as done (debian-policy: binary package doesn't contain version.ent) Bug#31452: marked as done (packaging-manual: diff for typos in relationship chapter) Bug#31946: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 17/01/1999] Adding dpkg-architecture to Packaging Manual) Bug#31961: marked as done (packaging-manual: editorial fixes) Bug#32448: debian-policy: policy(section 3.3.4) still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d Bug#32448: debian-policy: policy(section 3.3.4) still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d Bug#32448: debian-policy: policy(section 3.3.4) still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d Bug#32499: marked as done (debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL) Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority Bug#33156: marked as done (debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL) Bug#34233: marked as done (Policy typo (forwarded message from Chris Holden)) Bug#34543: marked as done (debian policy typo) Bug#34652: PROPOSAL] Policy is not clear about nawk. Bug#34988: marked as done (forwarded message from Tjebbe de Winter) Bug#35095: marked as done (Typo in policy manual (>Free)) Bug#36051: marked as done ([PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Bug#36286: marked as done (debian-policy: bad link) Bug#37089: debian-policy: /var/mail and FHS considerations Bug#37089: marked as done (debian-policy: /var/mail and FHS considerations) Bug#37233: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] FORMAL structure for DEBIAN-POLICY debate) Bug#37233: [PROPOSAL] FORMAL structure for DEBIAN-POLICY debate Bug#37233: PROPOSAL] FORMAL structure for DEBIAN-POLICY debate Bug#37257: marked as done ([PROPOSED] libtool `.la' files in `-dev' packages) Bug#37257: [PROPOSED] libtool `.la' files in `-dev' packages Bug#37338: [AMENDMENT] libtool `.la' files in `-dev' packages Bug#37338: AMENDMENT] libtool `.la' files in `-dev' packages Bug#37338: `.la' files -- neglected to mention some things Bug#37342: debian-policy: [PROPOSED] move to logrotate Bug#37345: [PROPOSAL] Adopt the FHS in place of FSSTND Bug#37345: PROPOSAL] Adopt the FHS in place of FSSTND Bug#37345: Wording in policy for FSSTND -> FHS change Bug#37364: marked as done (software depending on non-US (was: Re: Hey! Why does everybody love flaming so much? [was: `pure'])) Re: Bug#37364: software depending on non-US (was: Re: Hey! Why does everybody love flaming so much? [was: `pure']) Re: Bug#37532: coda-doc: HTML files gzipped Bug#37713: Menu proposal (bug 37713) seconds - for the record Bug#37713: One more change to menu policy? Bug#37713: [PROPOSED] separate menu policy (like virtual package list) Bug#37999: [PROPOSED]: A pre-install required space checking mechanism for Debian packages Bug#37999: PROPOSED]: A pre-install required space checking mechanism for Debian packages Bug#38212: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] rewrite of section 5.7 Bug#38212: Seconded Bug#38612: [PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package Re: Bug#38612: PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package Bug#38612: PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package Bug#8221: ispell suggests non-existant package CORRECTION: weekly policy summary Dead packages bugs dialout, dip, uucp groups. Economics 101 [was: Hey! ...] Re: Email in debian-policy that is throughly useless without non-free software and chip features. An Empty `real' virtual package ? FHS adoption (was: weekly policy summary) the freedom to boycott non-free software Re: Grades of stable-ness [was: GNOME --> potato: let's do it!] Hey! Why does everybody love flaming so much? [was: `pure'] Hey! Why does everybody love flaming so much? [was: `pure'] How to make/vote for a formal policy proposal I'm confused... where do X11 bins go? Installing things into run-parts or .d directories. [lack of] Public apology to Joseph Carter Large number of policy bugs let's be practical [Re: Software in main etc.] Re: Let's Debian blow... Re: Let's Debian blow... gracefully! Let's Debian blow... gracefully (was: Re: CORRECTION: weekly policy summary) Re: Let's Debian blow... gracefully! [was Re: Intent to package Let's Debian blow... gracefully! [was Re: Intent to package GNU Philosophy web pages] libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages libtool's .la files Lintian: "postgresql: non-standard-dir-in-var var/postgres/" Re: [logrotate] File handling questions. Re: [logrotate] Never mind... Re: logrotation Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Making sure that policy amendments don't die Marking the BTS according to Manoj's system md5sum proposal md5ums: Why tripwire etc is no solution Menu hierarchy Menu->policy (was Re: Policy Weekly for May 1) Menu proposal (was Re: weekly policy summary) [META] policy summaries More FHS stuff New non-us and main, and RSA non-US usage in policy manual Offtopic: ICQ and IRC Old bugs pending normal debian bugs for Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org> Policy Weekly for May 1 a possible 'strict' implementation pre-draft of FHS 2.1 Problem with dpkg-architecture Processed: Processed: Bug#21585: [PROPOSED] /etc/init.d/<script> need not be a conffile if actively maintained Processed: Bug#21820: [PROPOSED] bug in debian-emacs-policy.gz example script Processed: Clarify .la proposal bug reports Processed: crossing the i's and dotting the t's...wait a second... Processed: Maintainer unknown Processed: Marking the BTS according to Manoj's system Processed: Merge policy bugs Processed: Nawk problem is a non-problem Processed: Re: weekly policy summary Processed: Some non-proposals Proof of concept (was: PROPOSAL: configuration of packages) [PROPOSAL/AMENDMENT]: utmp group proposal PROPOSAL: automatic installation and configuration PROPOSAL: configuration of packages PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages Re: [PROPOSAL] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy [PROPOSAL] Patented software == non-free? Public humilation of Joseph Carter `pure' [was: Software in main that is throughly useless without non-free software] Section 5.7 not clear on X Windows system Re: software depending on non-US software depending on non-US (was: Re: Hey! Why does everybody love flaming so much? [was: `pure']) The last update was on 18:35 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 686 messages. Page 1 of 2.
<<
[previous month] 		|<
[first page] 		<
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 2
 >
[next page] 		>|
[last page] 		>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc