Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:
anton@localhost:
generated |cat >>$home/Mail/test/foo:
"cat" command not found for address_pipe transport
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Received: from localhost (mail.alfaskop.net) [127.0.0.1] (anton)
by camilla.emmerfors.net with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 10oBZN-0001z3-00; Sun, 30 May 1999 21:48:29 +0200
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [209.41.108.199])
by mail.alfaskop.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id UAA09030
for <anton@alfaskop.net>; Sun, 30 May 1999 20:08:51 +0200
Received: (qmail 28241 invoked by uid 38); 30 May 1999 18:08:35 -0000
Resent-Date: 30 May 1999 18:08:35 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
X-Envelope-Sender: branden@ecn.purdue.edu
From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 14:07:42 -0400
To: Kristoffer.Rose@ens-lyon.fr
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: I'm confused... where do X11 bins go?
Message-ID: <19990530140742.A15987@ecn.purdue.edu>
References: <19990529080613.A2704@efis.ucr.ac.cr> <19990530003527.A1757@ecn.purdue.edu> <14161.21003.58610.570050@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
In-Reply-To: <14161.21003.58610.570050@localhost>; from Kristoffer.Rose@ens-lyon.fr on Sun, May 30, 1999 at 05:03:26PM +0200
Resent-Message-ID: <"NB-YAD.A.A5G.i6XU3"@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-policy@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/4222
X-Loop: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, May 30, 1999 at 05:03:26PM +0200, Kristoffer.Rose@ens-lyon.fr wrote:
> But we should propose the move for FHS 2.1, IMO in the form of a single
> addition like "The subdirectories under /usr/X11R6 may be symbolic links =
to
> the corresponding subdirectories of /usr.".
I see so reason /usr/X11R6 has to continue to exist at all.
/usr/{bin,include,lib}/X11/ is the canonical path with which to reach X
stuff.
Therefore,
/usr/bin/X11 would be a symlink to /usr/bin (X11 -> .)
/usr/include/X11 would become a regular directory
/usr/lib/X11 would become a regular directory
--=20
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | "Bother," said Pooh, as he was
branden@ecn.purdue.edu | assimilated by the Borg.
cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
iQCVAwUBN1F+bqiRn0nSNFD5AQGAagQAzonHLgZWpA8E9VmAhacOaKL3mby6s5yM
nVJ2kQBJa2ozOsv1iJR+MoxnNeWdB9rrcD7nlEYrf584LlAMiPzJamscyt1+FXOB
lYsvedHMuzjUDLrb0lK+obo+Ke8aDQmpYpeYeylvSFb9/+8bPqVhctq6FuXfYQYA
yUQCFQzgMbw=
=kbPc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: