Re: Old bugs
- To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org ( Debian policy list)
- Subject: Re: Old bugs
- From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 07:55:16 -0700
- Message-id: <v04205112b377c87db20b@[206.163.71.146]>
- In-reply-to: <E10oAIl-0001GS-00@polya>
- References: <E10oAIl-0001GS-00@polya>
At 19:27 +0100 1999-05-30, Julian Gilbey wrote:
20099 No policy on /etc/environment
[Should we have one? A policy on it or even should we have it?]
Status: Proposal
We have several programs that use it, the problem is that there are
at least two different expected formats. I'd say we do need policy on
it.
33826 Para 3.3.2 (note number change!) says /etc/init.d scripts must
be named /etc/init.d/<package>; what about using '.sh' suffix?
Status: Proposal
For rcS scripts, .sh means the script should be sourced instead of executed.
For non-rcS scripts, it appears to mean that the script should not be
executed directly, rather it should be run as 'sh <script> <arg>'.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) Debian GNU/Linux Developer
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org> <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
<URL:http://web.espy.org/> <URL:http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to:
- References:
- Old bugs
- From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>