Re: logrotation
- To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: logrotation
- From: Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 15:12:07 +0200
- Message-id: <19990518151207.A29117@janux>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <19990428110808.A1106@balabit.saturnus.vein.hu> from "Balazs Scheidler" on 1999/04/28 11:08 +0200
- References: <19990428110808.A1106@balabit.saturnus.vein.hu>
Sorry to be so very late on this...
On Wed 28 Apr 1999, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
>
> Log files should usually be named `/var/log/<package>.log'. If you
I find the ".log" extension redundant here. After all, it's a
log directory, right? It's like having /bin/ls.bin ... Reminds me
of .exe extensions too much.
Additionally, it's not that common to have a logfile named after the
_package_ the daemon or whatever is in. Often the logfile is named
after the executable that generates the log.
Paul Slootman
--
home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl | work: paul@murphy.nl | debian: paul@debian.org
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
Reply to: