Re: the freedom to boycott non-free software
>>>>> Joseph Carter writes:
JC> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>] On Fri, May 07, 1999 at
JC> 01:59:44PM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
>> As a note, RMS just wrote me back:
JC> Would you mind posting the whole email?
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: the final piece
To: gord@trick.fig.org
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 10:36:27 -0600 (MDT)
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
X-From-Line: rms@gnu.org Fri May 07 16:42:35 1999
Return-Path: <rms@gnu.org>
Delivered-To: gord@trick.fig.org
Received: (qmail 27976 invoked from network); 7 May 1999 16:42:32 -0000
Received: from pele.santafe.edu (192.12.12.119)
by ip223.net247210.cr.sk.ca with SMTP; 7 May 1999 16:42:32 -0000
Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5])
by pele.santafe.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA07562;
Fri, 7 May 1999 10:36:28 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from rms@localhost)
by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id KAA24537;
Fri, 7 May 1999 10:36:27 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199905071636.KAA24537@wijiji.santafe.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@gnu.org using -f
In-reply-to: <86g15a8cr4.fsf@trick.fig.org> (message from Gordon Matzigkeit on
06 May 1999 08:59:59 -0600)
References: <86g15a8cr4.fsf@trick.fig.org>
Lines: 12
Xref: trick.fig.org misc:2846
Here's what we've been missing from /philosophy/free-sw.html:
freedom 4: The freedom to use the program as its author intended,
without requiring any non-free software.
I don't think this should be a part of the definition
of free software. Rather, it is a part of the definition
of free software that is useful for a free OS.
Perhaps free-sw.html should say a little about that issue as well
as its current topic.
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@fig.org> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
Reply to: