[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Patented software == non-free?



On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:01:59PM -0600, Richard Stallman wrote:
>     Encumbered in which country? In many countries (including the one
>     where non-us.debian.org resides) software patents are not accepted.
> 
> Which country is that?  If it is in Europe, I am afraid
> the situation may be about to change.

Pandora is in .nl...


>     I'd like to know RMS' opinion on the issue: why should I suffer from
>     silly laws of other countries?
> 
> What, precisely, is the issue?

Whether something that happens to be patented should be considered
non-free.  Currently it is.  I believe however that the proper place for
an otherwise free but patented bit of software is non-US/main.

--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Mercury> alexsh: Be /VERY/ cairful, you could, if your unlucky, fry your
          motherboards..

<Knghtbrd> Mercury - sounds like fun

Attachment: pgp5tNPEWmPpK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: