Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs

To: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>, 23355@bugs.debian.org
Cc: joey@debian.org
Subject: Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 18:06:36 +0200 (CET)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990531180202.1986B-100000@cantor.unex.es>
Reply-to: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, 23355@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <E10oOps-0002eP-00@polya>

On Mon, 31 May 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:

> Now that we have a "fixed" priority in the developers-reference (this
> is not in policy itself), can this proposal be closed?

Well, what I would like to see is a general policy about bugs, covering
all aspects of bug reporting, forwarding, severitying and closing. Who is
allowed to do that, and when. For example, how many times are a submitter
allowed to reopen a bug (I would say that only once), or how do we decide
about a bug being normal or wishlist (current practice says package
maintainer has the last word about this).

Thanks.

-- 
 "591fab7db8b56bf93fea8e6051d1cecf" (a truly random sig)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

References:
- Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Next by Date: Bug#22518: marked as done ([PROPOSED] smartlist: don't die if /etc/aliases is not a file)
Previous by thread: Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs
Next by thread: Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread