Re: PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages

To: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages
From: psu25682@odin.cc.pdx.edu (Karl M. Hegbloom)
Date: 06 May 1999 00:56:53 -0700
Message-id: <87d80ezl4q.fsf@odin.cc.pdx.edu>
In-reply-to: Joel Klecker's message of "Tue, 4 May 1999 18:22:49 -0700"
References: <199905041758.MAA08378@taumsauk.cs.wustl.edu> <19990504174806.P17940@kitenet.net> <v04204e04b3554962f253@[206.163.71.146]>

>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org> writes:

    Joel> I suggest not using the term versioning to refer to sonames,
    Joel> it is too easy to confuse it with symbol versioning.

 Where may we read about symbol versioning and things of that nature,
 please?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

References:
- PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages
  - From: Ossama Othman <othman@cs.wustl.edu>
- Re: PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- Re: PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages
  - From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>

Prev by Date: Re: let's be practical [Re: Software in main etc.]
Next by Date: Re: Hey! Why does everybody love flaming so much? [was: `pure']
Previous by thread: Re: PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages
Next by thread: Re: PROPOSAL: libtool archive (`*.la) files in `-dev' packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread