Re: a possible 'strict' implementation
>>>>> shaleh writes:
s> What if as discussed previously, deb packages had some extra info
s> that apps like dselect/apt/foo can key off of.
[...]
s> No stigma need fall on packages.
Beautiful.
I also like Marcus' name `strict'... `non-strict' doesn't have the
same stigma as `non-pure'.
Seeing as I've already said too much about these ideas, would somebody
else please submit a proposal?
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@fig.org> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
Reply to: