Re: `pure' [was: Software in main that is throughly useless without non-free software]
>>>>> Santiago Vila writes:
SV> Need a little clarification to understand this:
SV> Currently: Debian == main. After this, how things would be,
SV> Debian == pure + main or Debian == pure?
After my proposal:
Debian == main
Pure Debian == pure
So, `Pure Debian' is just a proper subset of `Debian'. A useful and
desireable subset, but still just subset.
`main' is still important because it points out deficiencies in
`pure'.
`contrib' is still important, because it points out deficiencies in
`main'.
`non-free' is still important, because it points out deficiencies in
`contrib + main'.
The day that all software is free software, `pure' will be the only
distribution we need to do absolutely everything with our computers.
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@fig.org> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
Reply to: