[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: `pure' [was: Software in main that is throughly useless without non-free software]



>>>>> Santiago Vila writes:

 SV> Need a little clarification to understand this:

 SV> Currently: Debian == main.  After this, how things would be,
 SV> Debian == pure + main or Debian == pure?

After my proposal:

Debian == main
Pure Debian == pure

So, `Pure Debian' is just a proper subset of `Debian'.  A useful and
desireable subset, but still just subset.

`main' is still important because it points out deficiencies in
`pure'.

`contrib' is still important, because it points out deficiencies in
`main'.

`non-free' is still important, because it points out deficiencies in
`contrib + main'.

The day that all software is free software, `pure' will be the only
distribution we need to do absolutely everything with our computers.

-- 
 Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@fig.org>  //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)


Reply to: