On Sat, May 01, 1999 at 02:53:31PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > > I still feel this way. I really don't see the advantage of putting > > something in policy right now when we already know it's going to be > > overhauled anyway. So I guess I propose postponing this until > > after the overhaul. > > I'll say again - it can help enourmously to have an agreed upon base that > *we know works fairly well* before starting to change everything. It limits > the changes people are going to propose. > > Anyway, does anyone else agree with Wichert or is he the lone objector? I cee his point, and I don't disagree with it. I'm kinda indifferent, but I do see the point he's trying to make and agree that it's necessary to modify the menu hierarchy, either now or after it becomes policy. Either way it needs to happen and pretty soon. Which happens first is really a matter of how people want to handle the policy of changing it and getting it into the policy document as far as I'm concerned. -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "and i actually like debian 2.0 that much i completely revamped the default config of the linux systems our company sells and reinstalled any of the linux systems in the office and here at home.."
Attachment:
pgpuSsJQpdyq1.pgp
Description: PGP signature