Bug#21585: PROPOSED] /etc/init.d/<script> need not be a conf
On 30-May-99 Julian Gilbey wrote:
> retitle 21585 [PROPOSED] /etc/init.d/<script> need not be a conffile if
> actively maintained
> thanks
>
> I second this proposal. I suggest that the paragraph in question (now
> in section 3.3.5) be reworded as:
>
> _Do not_ include the `/etc/rc<n>.d/*' symbolic links in `dpkg''s
> conffiles list! _This will cause problems!_ _Do_, however, either
> include the `/etc/init.d' scripts in conffiles or handle them
> fully in the maintainer scripts. (This is important since we want
> to give the local system administrator the chance to adapt the scripts
> to the local system--e.g., to disable a service without deinstalling
> the package, or to specify some special command line options when
> starting a service--while making sure her changes aren't lost during
> the next package upgrade. Hence, if the maintainer scripts option is
> taken, the scripts must be careful not interfere with any
> user-modified scripts, and must take care to remove the file when
> the package is purged.)
>
This would take away the admins ability to make modifications to the scripts.
I would find this to be a bad thing.
Reply to: